Marko's Rant and the Ladder of Inference:
I'm reading
Marko's rant by a runt series and I think it's great stuff. Marko is doing a great job of clearly defining broad assumptions churches in America hold. This post was inspired by Marko and is not a critique of him. He is my muse. :-)
Herein lies the problem with rants*.
When you critique one person(or groups) assumptions, you insert your own assumptions in their place. This is the jist of the shift we are seeing in the world and in the church. A shift of assumptions.
This is basic systems thinking. (not to be confuses (too much) with systemitizers who Marko rants against)
Last centurty a guy named Chris Argyris developed what is now known as the "ladder of inference".
Here's how it works. I'll work from the bottom rung up to the top.
First. Rung number one.Raw real life. Data. Everything going on around you. It is all that encompasses life, creation and behavior. Everything that is makes up this rung.
Second. Rung number two.As we go through life
we gather peices of data. Selected data. It's not complete, for to soak in all of life would overwhelm us. Simply to much to process. We see certain people. Other people are invisible to us. We hear certain noises, voices, smells and taste. Others do not make the cut. This step is our experience of the raw real life data and our selecting certain parts.
Third. Rung number three.So now we have selected data. Experiences we call real. They are real. But not all of the picture.
At this point we attach meaning to our selections. Is the data we've selected good? Bad? Helpful? Hurtful? Painful? We give meaning to the data at this point in the ladder.
The Fourth Rung of the Ladder.We develop an assumption. This happens fast. Very fast. BAM! Just like that we have experienced life, selected data, given it meaning and now we are working the data. Who? what?when? where? why? Here is a big leap.
B-I-G L-E-A-P ! !Rung number Five.At this point in the process we
come to some conclusions. The conclusions are built upond our assumptions, which are given life from the meaning we attached to the selected data we mined from all of life. We all have conclusions. Jr high students always _________. fill in the blank. Sushi is _______. Suburban white people are ________. Tori Amos is ________. Parents can be _________. No matte what you put in these blanks, these are your conclusions. You are drawing conclusions right now as you read this. About me, the author. My writing ability, or lack there of. Conclusions are the firm ground we build for ourselves born from assumptions we create from the meaning we give certain experiences we have in life. Conclusions are the food for rung number six.
Rung number six.From our conclusions we develop
beliefs. When we put together our conclusions they become our beliefs. Beliefs about God. Beliefs about humankind, marriage, nature, business and institutions. There's one more rung, but before I share it with you. It's important to note that this rung of belief serves as a lens by which we select new data from the world. It also serves as a benchmark by which we give meaning to that data. If you want to know why it's hard to overcome childhood experiences... this is it. Our past influences our future. This can only be changed by some kind of outside encounter that breaks through assumptions and conclusions we make. This is why the way of jesus is so miraculous and important. Some people may call this a world view. Others may call this a script.
In systems theory, when a belief influences what new data we select and what meaning is attributed to that data , it's called a feedback loop. It snowballs and reenforces previous beliefs.
Rung number seven.Action. Argyris argues that belief informs action. What you believe about the world and how it works and how God relates to it, informs how you relate to the world. How you treat people, how you live within nature, etc.
All that being said.
It is certainly not wrong to critique or rant, but is serves us well to understand why we are ranting, and what it is in us and others that informs our understanding about God and mankind.
*and I love rants. Back in 2000-2001 I wrote a rant a week for a column on theooze.com